Remaining Steadfast in our Purpose: The Ethical & Moral Basis for Sustaining DEIA in Education

Nov 13


 A new three-part series from CRSLI to help school leaders navigate the shifting legal landscape with confidence and clarity.


This is the third and final brief in a three-part series CRSLI is publishing alongside our latest podcast episodes to help educators navigate the shifting legal landscape of DEIA in education. This closing brief makes the ethical and practical case for remaining steadfast in Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility as core to the mission of education. It summarizes the current problem, weighs policy paths, and offers CRSL-aligned recommendations that leaders can adopt now within existing legal frameworks.

Authored by the CRSLI Team and Jeremy Chan-Kraushar, an educator and attorney, each brief offers practical guidance and legal context. These briefs are intended as a tool for empowering culturally responsive school leaders to use effective strategies in order to remain steadfast in advancing educational equity while staying within the bounds of current law.

Listen to the full conversation below and download the brief to share with colleagues.

Executive Summary

Increasingly intensifying political attacks continue to pressure districts, colleges, and state agencies to abandon diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEIA) initiatives. Yet decades of scholarship—from The Century Foundation’s research briefs to recent National Institutes of Health (NIH) meta-analyses—confirm that racially, socio-economically, and neurologically diverse learning communities raise academic achievement and spur innovation and increase civic cohesion. Beyond demonstrated academic benefits, DEIA’s focus on understanding and mitigating the impact of oppression and marginalization in schools is an integral extension of the ongoing movement for civil rights in the United States. Educators therefore have an ethical duty to defend academic freedom and civil rights while broadening opportunity and access. This brief outlines why remaining steadfast in the current political moment is morally sound, educationally necessary, pragmatic, and supported constitutionally. The following contains a short problem overview, policy alternatives, and CRSL’s policy recommendations containing concrete steps that institutions and individuals can adopt now for remaining steadfast in your purpose in support of DEIA.

Introduction

Whether you teach third grade math or chair a university department, the reason you likely entered the profession was to expand minds, foster critical inquiry, and enable every learner to thrive. DEIA (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility) is simply the operationalization of that core purpose. As the National DEI Defense Coalition reminds us, “truth-seeking and justice-seeking are inseparable in education.” Retreating from DEIA erodes that mission, undercuts constitutional guarantees of free expression, and in the long run, jeopardizes U.S. economic competitiveness in a pluralistic world.

Problem Overview

Growing Censorship & Chilled Speech
  • As of September 2025, 20 states have enacted bills limiting classroom discussion of race, gender, or systemic bias (Brookings).
  • Since 2021, 415 public school districts across 43 states have experienced book bans, predominantly targeting books by and about people of color, LGBTQ+ individuals, and titles discussing racism, sexuality, and gender (PEN America).
  • Faculty report a 35% rise in self-censorship; graduate students cite fear of retaliation (FIRE, 2024).

Persistent Inequities
  • Black students are 4 times more likely than their White peers to be suspended for the same infraction (Ballard Brief) and receive far harsher discipline comparatively (UC Berkeley Public Health). These inequities have persisted - and in many cases, worsened - over time.
  • Black students are 40% more likely to be referred to special education than their non-Black peers (National Center for Learning Disabilities, 2023).
  • Students with disabilities are disciplined through out-of-school suspensions, are referred to police, and are chronically absent at much higher rates than their non-disabled counterparts (Center for Civil Rights Remedies, 2021).

Educational & Economic Costs
  • Companies with above-average diversity produce 19% higher innovation revenue; schools serve as that talent pipeline (Boston Consulting Group).
  • Diverse cohorts of workers experiencing feelings of inclusion increase team collaboration by 29%, decision-making quality by 20%, and overall team performance by 17% (Deloitte, 2018).

Possible Approaches

A. Compliance-Only (“Circle the Wagons”)
  • Erase or minimize DEIA references to avoid litigation.
  • Risk: forfeits mission, invites inequity lawsuits later.

B. Symbolic Solidarity
  • Issue statements in support of DEIA concepts, but maintain limited programming.
  • Risk: seen as performative; limited impact on student outcomes.

C. Purpose-Driven Integration (Recommended)
  • Embed DEIA in curriculum, staffing, assessment, and community partnerships within existing legal frameworks.
  • Benefit: honors ethical duty, maximizes learning gains, withstands legal scrutiny.

Recommendations

Adopt a Public Values Statement
  • Reaffirm your organization’s commitment to free inquiry and civil-rights compliance; cite constitutional and federal and state statutory protections (1st & 14th Amendments, Title VI, ADA).
     
Institutionalize Equity Minded and Culturally Responsive Pedagogy and Leadership
  • Incorporate culturally responsive teaching standards or similar metrics into educator evaluations and professional-development cycles. Partner with organizations like CRSLI to provide school leaders with professional development.
  • Leverage NIH -research showing that aspects of culturally responsive teaching relate to positive student outcomes, such as increased student engagement, better achievement, and more positive peer relationships.

Create Protected Faculty/Staff Affinity & Mentorship ProgramsAlign Programs with Universal Goals
  • Use non-exclusionary eligibility criteria (“all are welcome”) while still centering content themes on “historically underserved” categories to avoid potential equal protection (14th amendment) claims of “reverse discrimination”.

Publish Disaggregated Outcome Dashboards
  • Discipline, GPA, extracurricular participation; establish organizational commitments to improvement targets on an annual basis. Transparency yields continuous improvement and shields against claims of intentional discrimination.
     

Partner Externally


Conclusion

Educators have always been the frontline stewards of both knowledge and democracy. The empirical benefits of diverse learning communities and culturally responsive and sustaining education, coupled with the moral imperative to honor every student’s dignity, require unwavering commitment to DEIA. By embedding equity into core practices and policies—rather than tacking it on as a political accessory—institutions can ensure they protect free speech, enrich scholarship, and prepare their graduates for a multicultural, interconnected society. No matter your educational organization, now is the time to reflect deeply on the reasons that led you to your current work, and the underlying purpose of your own role in education. Know that educators have always been at the forefront of protecting the ability to teach the truth about history, science, and humanity. While being open to adapting to the real risks and dangers of this political moment, policymakers, educational leaders, and educators should champion, not curtail, this foundational work.
Jeremy Chan-Kraushar is an educator, attorney, and former Senior Director of Culturally Responsive and Sustaining Education at NYC Public Schools, where he led landmark equity initiatives and designed citywide professional learning. He coordinated programs such as Connected Foundations, Digital Ready, the Competency Collaborative, and the historic Implicit Bias Awareness Initiative. He also founded the Citywide CRSE Professional Learning Community in partnership with NYU, bringing together over 100 equity teams across the district. Over the course of his career, Jeremy has facilitated workshops for more than 10,000 educators and continues to bridge teaching, policy, and law in service of equity and justice.